Apropos of Little: Four Pleasures of a Team Allegiance by Carson Cistulli June 10, 2013 A common sight at Safeco Field. Central to the enjoyment of baseball for many of that sport’s fans is the cultivation and maintenance of a team allegiance. Below, apropos of little, are four pleasures derived from same. Family Tradition Frequently, children inherit the team allegiances of their parents and, before them, grandparents. There’s a certain pleasure to be derived from this continuity within a family. Our bodies seem predisposed to derive pleasure from the passing down of rituals from one generation to the next. One remembers, for example, being taken at a young age to Fenway Park, and looks forward, perhaps, to taking his or her own child to Fenway Park. Reinforcement of Regional Identity There are many symbols which surround a baseball club designed to celebrate and reinforce the collective values or organizing ideas of a region. Some team names (Brewers, Twins) make specific reference to a region or city’s unique qualities. Some ballparks possess visual reminders of regional — like Coors Field’s mile-high seats, for example, or the view afforded of the Roberto Clemente Bridge by Pittsburgh’s PNC Park. Fanbases themselves have reputations which augment a region’s identity — like vomiting on children, for example. Shared Experience Not dissimilar to, but distinct from, the two qualities noted above is that of the shared experience provided by a team allegiance. Two strangers from the greater Seattle area, for example, can embark upon a relatively intimate discussion (probably one which involves considerable sobbing) after learning of each other’s allegiance to the Mariners. Likewise, a team-specific blog (like Lookout Landing or USS Mariner) provides the opportunity for discourse and relationship-forging between individuals who have only one specific thing in common. The Role of Chance In 2003, after Tim Wakefield conceded a game-winning home run to Aaron Boone in the ALCS, a friend of mine told me: “I keep betting on the Red Sox, Carson, not with money but with my emotional well-being.” In a sense, team allegiances are defined by a series of small wagers of well-being — on the result of a pitch, a game, etc. Late French philosopher Roger Caillois identifies chance (or alea, as he calls it — a Latin name for the game of dice) as one of the four main types of games. With regard to games of chance, he writes, “[D]estiny is the sole artisan of victory, and where there is a rivalry, what is meant is that the winner has been more favored by fortune than the loser.” Because of other qualities mentioned above, of course, there is even some pleasure to be derived from losing these emotional wagers — because one can also grieve communally.