Video: Giants Fan Caught “Scopin’ Like a Big Dawg”

In the top of the fifth inning of last night’s Giants-Phillies game, Giant broadcasters Duane Kuiper and Mike Krukow noticed a San Francisco fan (pictured, wearing orange Fear the Beard t-shirt) amidst a crowd of Philadelphians.

Later in that inning, they noticed that same fan noticing a second, more female, fan — which observation prompted Krukow to utter the words that have inspired (a) this post and (b) millions worldwide.

Some assorted observations:
• Mike Krukow has a Baseball Man voice. I’m not sure what the precise signifiers of the Baseball Man voice are, but one of them is probably “a marked aversion for the final -g- in the present participle.” Other purveyors of the Baseball Man voice include Mark Grace, (Padre TV analyst) Mark Grant, and Rick Sutcliffe.

• Were one so inclined to write a three- or five-page paper called something like “Masculine Identity in Baseballing Telecasts” using only this 17-second clip as source material, it could probably be done with some ease.

Dawg or dogg: how would Mike Krukow spell it? how would you?


UETAMEJ!

I know what you’re thinking: “What is UETAMEJ, and what can it do for me?” Like the best acronyms, UETAMEJ is pronounceable and fits conveniently on the full complement of CafePress swag. As you’ve probably already guessed, it stands for, “Using Ellipses Toward A More Evil Journalism.” I hardly need to say this, but the practice of UETAMEJ, which is as ancient as it is sacred, entails the use of the ellipsis in tandem with words and phrases ripped from context and stripped of intended meaning.

This week’s victim is the likable and excellent Ray Ratto, who recently penned a likable and excellent column on last night’s absurd happenings in Atlanta. But what’s he really saying?

Release the UETAMEJ!

Jerry Meals[,] . . . acknowledge that this is . . . the crime of the century. Jerry Meals screwed this one up, spectacularly so, . . . because he is inherently evil. God in heaven, will you please . . . murder . . . Jerry Meals[?] Because it is my firm belief that . . . baseball would benefit from . . . the . . . murder . . . of . . . Jerry Meals. Reasonable people can . . . shut up.

I . . . will . . . be . . . in the only bar in Atlanta that stays open beyond 3 a.m. . . . with . . . a jackhammer[,] . . . Tim Donaghy[,] . . . some . . . hallucinogens[,] . . . and . . . a tomato with eyes.

Behold the evil journalism!


Rules of the Game: Calling a Santana a Santana


Show Off

If there’s one thing Carson Cistulli is all about it’s feeling good and looking better. If there are two things Carson Cistulli is all about, the second one is making mountains out of molehills wherein matters of baseballing etiquette are concerned.

It’s the latter of these pastimes that I’d like to address presently.

This afternoon, while enjoying an entirely drinkable rosé, I found myself watching the Cleveland-Los Angeles Americans game via MLB.TV. Did I happen to notice that beardless youths Peter Bourjos and Mike Trout were not only playing beside each other in the Angel outfield, but also batting back-to-back in the Angel lineup? No, not at all. That’s ridiculous.

Okay, maybe a little bit.

Fine. Yes. Totally.

Read the rest of this entry »


The Pictorial Odyssey of Von Hayes

Last weekend the Right Honourable Dayn Perry, Esq. cast a wary glance into the soulful eyes of Von Hayes.  The archetypal quick-aging baseball player, Hayes was finished physically by the age of 32.  His spirit was crushed by the weight of five men and the city of Philadelphia somewhat earlier.  What we see in Von Hayes is the human gamut of emotion, a timeline that encompasses innocence, hope, fatigue, mistrust, despair, and eventually resignation.  In Von Hayes, we see ourselves.

Witness the early years of Von Hayes, ones of unfamiliarity and wavering confidence, the tender mustache worn perhaps to deflect questions as to whether he is Robert Hays.  Even his unibrow reaches tenuously from his forehead, seeking to make its way in the world. Advance to the early evenings in Philadelphia, and observe the brave mask he wears even as he disappoints men and women he has never met. They are unhappy with him because of what he is not. They are unhappy with him because it is not enough to be Von Hayes.

Read the rest of this entry »


Shorter Baseball Columnists!

It’s time for another installment of “Shorter Baseball Columnists,” in which we read mainstream baseball columnists and marginalized bloggers like Murray Chass so you don’t have to! Let us begin!

Shorter Bob Ryan: Confused about how to resolve the “PED users and the Hall of Fame” conundrum? Boy, do I have a terrible idea!

Shorter Dan Shaughnessy: A number of athletes have said stupid things on Twitter. This is Twitter’s fault.

Shorter Woody Paige: Ubaldo Jimenez is much like every other person who lives in Colorado, in that they couldn’t possibly want to live anywhere else.

Shorter Jim Souhan: A number of nameless, unquoted, possibly nonexistent fans want the Twins to sell off at the deadline so as to ensure that the team doesn’t get embarrassed in the playoffs once again. The Twins should totally sell off at the deadline, but that’s not why they should do it.

Shorter Bruce Jenkins: The Brewers’ pennant hopes will quite possibly hinge on Nyjer Morgan’s flamboyance.

Shorter Mike Peticca: I don’t understand WAR. At all.

The “Shorter” approach to Internetty commentary traces back, as best as one can tell, to Daniel Davies.


Homo (Less Than) Erectus: A Scott Proctor Flip Book

As my colleague — and America’s Kid Brother™ — Jackie Moore noted in the smallest hour of the night, Tuesday’s 19-inning affair between Pittsburgh and Atlanta ended in an unexpected and controversial manner.

For more on the game’s decisive play, I direct your attention either (a) once again to Jackie’s post or (b) the home for entirely reasonable discourse that is the internet.

Equally deserving of our attention is what happened on the other end of the play — batter (pitcher?) Scott Proctor’s end, I mean. For it was Proctor, owner of three career plate appearances and three career strikeouts before last night, who set the wheels of this baseballing soap opera into motion.

What you see down and to the right is a flip book of sorts documenting the initial moments of Proctor’s departure from the batter’s box. Because the image is long, I’ve presented alongside it poet Matthew Arnold’s poem “Dover Beach,” something with which the bespectacled reader will want to become acquainted if his dreams of becoming a Real Aristocrat are ever to be realized.

I leave it to the reader’s discretion to determine the exact identity of Arnold’s “ignorant armies.”

DOVER BEACH

The sea is calm tonight,
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits; on the French coast the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand,
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the sea meets the moon-blanched land,
Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the Agean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.


“Obvious”

Anybody who is still up at this hour is definitely familiar with the play that ended the Pirates-Braves game that began on July 26th. Just in case you’ve forgotten, here’s a video.

Pretty wild stuff. As the Pirates announcer said, “The throw beat him by a mile!!” But wait, Mike McKenry actually had to tag Julio Lugo. The consensus seems to be it was an obvious call. Obviously, says everyone, or most everyone at least, McKenry tagged him!

Just watch the video again, and try to find the tag on the replays.

“The throw beat him by a mile!” “And he’s saying that he wasn’t tagged?!”

Here is the picture most generally accepted (by myself included) to be proof of the tag, originally posted by @TravHaney.

Maybe I’m just insane. Maybe I’m just looking for something that isn’t there (or maybe I’m trying not to find something that is there). But that is, at best, a tangent-point tag. Can we definitively say, even from that picture, where glove ends and where shadow begins? It’s not like blowing the picture up really helps any, does it? Maybe I need my eyes checked.

Julio Lugo was probably out at home, but because the ball beat him by so much, we seem convinced that the tag was there. Is this fair? Actually, possibly it is. It doesn’t matter by the rules, but I’m damn sure, despite the fact that McKenry’s tag would be just as questionable if Lugo was called out, there wouldn’t be this kind of investigation going on and I would be asleep.

This is just a bunch of rambling, but the point is that watching it in real time, from multiple angles, and even in slow motion, it’s very, very, very difficult for me to point out where the tag actually occurred. This isn’t the Joyce-Galarraga play, where the video and pictorial evidence was so obvious. This is a case where, in my opinion, the confirmation bias of seeing baseball beat runner by so much — “The throw beat him by a mile!!” — manifested itself in a similar reaction.

I’m just not so sure it’s as obvious as everybody says it is.


Mustache Watch: Joel Hanrahan


To click, perchance to embiggen.

No sensible person would call the thing on Joel Hanrahan’s face a mustache. Some pretty thorough research reveals that there really is no word for what Hanrahan has — or, no English word, I should say. In fact, the Polish do appear to have a term for it: wuj moszna, I think it is. Pronounced just like it’s spelled, one imagines.


Three Examples of Brilliant Baseball Writing

You know what I love? The New York Times. On Saturday, the resilient newspaper published a piece by Bill Pennington called “Kei Igawa: The Lost Yankee,” and it is a perfect example of what I consider to be brilliant baseball writing; the type of baseball writing I enjoy reading most. I urge you to take the time to read the piece; it’s well worth it.

Much like, well, everyone, I’d forgotten all about Kei Igawa. I had no idea he was still in North America, grinding in the minors while making Major League money. I figured he went back to Japan. Years ago. But he didn’t. Hasn’t. Won’t.

As Pennington points out, Igawa wakes every morning in his Midtown East Manhattan apartment, and is then chauffeured either the 90-minute drive to Trenton, New Jersey, or two hours and ten minutes to Scranton, Pennsylvania. And back. Currently on the roster of the Trenton Thunder, Igawa figured his stay in the minors would be temporary when he was sent down, hence the ride. Turns out, it was the opposite: Igawa will never again pitch for the New York Yankees. General Manager Brian Cashman, quoted in the article, didn’t hold back: “Yeah, he’s passed me on the drive down to Trenton. He drives faster than his fastball.” Burn.

Read the rest of this entry »


Winning the SABR Debate, Part I

Part I of an infinity part series dedicated to dissecting the bad ideas of SABR-bashers.

We’ve all reached that point in the discussion. The point when, say, you are debating the merits of a given player and you have just cited xFIP, or wOBA, or WAR.

“What!??” your opponent replies incredulously. “What the hell is xFIP/wOBA/WAR?”

“Well, it’s an advanced metric that measures such and such,” you explain.

Your opponent scoffs. “I don’t have time for these made-up stats. They take all the fun out of the game for me.”

It is at this moment that the discussion has usually reached the point of no return. It’s like one of those Choose Your Own Adventure books; you can either escalate things by snarking the living shit out of your opponent or you can extricate yourself from the discussion and risk looking weak. Either way, there can be no “winner”.

Not too long ago, the release of the book The Beauty of Short Hops: How Chance and Circumstance Confound the Moneyball Approach to Baseball by Alan and Sheldon Hirsch touched off a minor controversy in the world of baseball commentary. Among other things, their book takes up the “sabermetrics takes all the fun out of the game” position:

[T]he saber-obsession with numbers occludes a major aspect of baseball’s beauty – its narrative richness and relentless capacity to surprise. Baseball, thank goodness, transcends and often defies quantitative analysis. Games are decided by bad hops and bad calls, broken bats, sun and wind, pigeons in the outfield, and fans who obstruct players, among other unforeseeable contingencies. That may seem obvious (apart from the pigeons), but not to the folks who increasingly run the show. Rather than celebrating baseball’s delightfully spontaneous quality, sabermetricians deny it or rebel against it.

Let us leave aside for a moment that this sentiment is commonly expressed by people who are unable or unwilling to grapple with new statistics with which they are unfamiliar. Of course these people too use statistics to make sense of what happens on the baseball field, just less insightful statistics. In fact, a large portion of the Hirsches’ book is devoted to a feeble attempt at debunking specific advanced stats. Others have already done a fine job of critiquing the Hirsch brothers’ book and I do not wish to retread too much old ground. Rather, here I want to engage on its own terms the all too common argument that advanced statistics obscure the game’s beauty.

Read the rest of this entry »