Discovery: Good Names Are Best, Best Names Are Feh
Behold! My latest, most impressive findings!
Teams with dumb names (such as the Mets and Orioles) typically cannot hit as well as teams with average names (such as the Dodgers and Astros), while teams with superior names (such as the Pirates and Tigers) hit as poorly as their ill-named counterparts! These findings were not only significant at the 99% level, but they also had an R-squared near 0.224 — meaning a full 22% of a team’s offense come from the pride they take in their name!
It is a well known axiom that players hit precisely how they feel, so when you go out, day after day, wearing the emblem of a cute little bird, it is very difficult to muster the wherewithal to swing a club at a ball. Using Weighted On-Base Average (wOBA) and Name Awesomeness Plus (NA+, a completely arbitrary stat I invented for the purpose of this study), we can see how having a name that’s too awesome can be just as detrimental to performance!

We can only assume that if a team has an exceedingly awesome name, such as the Cubs, Pirates, or Braves, the players have less incentive to play hard. They already feel good about themselves, so they do not need to prove themselves any further.
For the full data set, see below.
***
Statistical significance is bunk. Absolute bunk. People who live by 99%, 95%, and 90% have enclosed themselves In Schrodinger’s toxic box, slaves to R.A. Fisher’s Prism of Arbitrariness. That is all.
Data set:
Team | wOBA | wRC+ | Fld | WAR | NA | NA+ |
Pirates | 0.296 | 81 | 1 | 2.7 | 160 | 215 |
Cubs | 0.327 | 97 | -5.7 | 4.8 | 134 | 180 |
Tigers | 0.322 | 102 | -0.2 | 5.5 | 130 | 175 |
Braves | 0.308 | 90 | -13 | 3.1 | 130 | 175 |
Brewers | 0.317 | 96 | 5 | 5.9 | 115 | 155 |
Diamondbacks | 0.318 | 91 | 8.5 | 5.3 | 111 | 149 |
Rangers | 0.34 | 112 | -6.6 | 6.1 | 110 | 148 |
Giants | 0.297 | 81 | -6.1 | 2 | 110 | 148 |
Indians | 0.334 | 113 | 2.7 | 7.3 | 100 | 134 |
Mariners | 0.284 | 81 | -14 | 0.1 | 98 | 132 |
Royals | 0.335 | 110 | 6 | 7.5 | 90 | 121 |
Rays | 0.322 | 106 | 16.3 | 7.5 | 86 | 116 |
Cardinals | 0.352 | 120 | 8.4 | 11.3 | 85 | 114 |
Dodgers | 0.308 | 91 | -1.9 | 4.4 | 78 | 105 |
Astros | 0.312 | 94 | -19.1 | 2.9 | 76 | 102 |
Reds | 0.339 | 107 | 5.7 | 8.2 | 60 | 81 |
Blue Jays | 0.328 | 107 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 60 | 81 |
Marlins | 0.321 | 96 | 8.8 | 6.3 | 60 | 81 |
Yankees | 0.348 | 119 | 7.6 | 8.5 | 50 | 67 |
Phillies | 0.32 | 95 | -2.9 | 4.9 | 50 | 67 |
Rockies | 0.313 | 84 | 7.1 | 3.8 | 48 | 65 |
Red Sox | 0.328 | 104 | 3.1 | 5.9 | 45 | 61 |
Padres | 0.295 | 88 | 8.4 | 4.9 | 45 | 61 |
White Sox | 0.307 | 89 | -8.8 | 2.1 | 45 | 61 |
Angels | 0.325 | 106 | 12.9 | 7.7 | 43 | 58 |
Nationals | 0.293 | 78 | -8.3 | 1.2 | 35 | 47 |
Orioles | 0.303 | 87 | -5.9 | 1.9 | 30 | 40 |
Athletics | 0.291 | 85 | -11 | 1 | 25 | 34 |
Mets | 0.32 | 99 | -13.4 | 4.6 | 12 | 16 |
Twins | 0.28 | 75 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 10 | 13 |
Nice work. I would like to see some historical research and see how the Colt 45’s faired. Works every time.
Ooh! I hadn’t even considered historical names! The Highlanders, the Orphans, the x Stockings! There’s a lot of potential there.